> I've no idea how the Wikipedia article manages to get itself represented > twice, with two different titles (one of which redirects to the other). > Personally, I think redirecting the thing to Santorum's BLP and covering > it there would be the "encyclopedic" thing to do. > > The comparison to Bowdlerise, Orwellian etc. is IMO unrealistic. Those > neologisms have stood the test of time, and have been used un-consciously > in > prose. "Santorum" is a conscious joke word. > > Andreas
Well, too much. I'm on-board for fighting fascism, but not using Wikipedia as a vehicle. We need to have a policy discussion on-wiki about this. I've been actually reading the sources cited; this is interesting and useful information, but needs to be handled more appropriately by both Wikipedia and Google. We need to bring the creator, and protector, of the article into the discussion too. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l