On 24/05/2011 18:49, George Herbert wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Fred Bauder<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yes, let's replace our elite judgment for that of everyone else. >> You've got one word right, "our". You are responsible for this. > No, he (and we) are not. Dan Savage is responsible for this. > Right - and an egregious case of bullying it is, based on a distinctive surname. (Fred's comparison with ED is not off-beam, just missing the point IMO.) I'm clear that, in human terms, I have a low opinion of it. If our article doesn't give the data that would make it possible to come up with an informed opinion on Savage's campaign on that level, then it is failing. Too much to ask whether it could do the same on the issues of whether this kind of campaigning actually changes minds, or discredits freedom of speech, etc. These things are more interesting, when it comes down to it, but constraints on OR mean the article is really just a compilation of quotes from journalism.
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
