On 19 January 2012 13:12, Daniel R. Tobias <[email protected]> wrote:

> It appears that wikipediareview.org also belongs to them and has not
> yet expired, but unfortunately they have it set up to redirect to the
> nonfunctional .com domain.  (I personally would have done the
> redirection the opposite way, since it's a noncommercial criticism
> and discussion site, more logically done as a .org rather than
> implying commerciality with .com; Wikipedia itself switched from .com
> to .org when it went noncommercial.)  They could easily make their
> site accessible again simply by setting up the .org domain to point
> directly at the site instead of redirecting, but probably that
> configuration is in the hands of the same person who failed to renew
> the other domain, maybe a different person than whoever manages the
> web hosting itself.  I could never untangle the details of the
> ownership/management of that site, which has sometimes been in heated
> dispute.


It turns out that trolls and cranks don't get along with each other
any better than they get along with the rest of us.


- d.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to