On 18 April 2012 13:53, Thomas Morton <morton.tho...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> I'm not arguing Wikipedia is the solution. But the argument that
> printed encyclopaedias are better at this I know to be false.

More generally, arguments that make a comparison between an idealised
fantasy Britannica and a real-life WIkipedia are likely to be bad ones
and should be avoided.

- d.

WikiEN-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:

Reply via email to