It is "spamish".
As for the concept of the speedy deletion wiki it is comparable to
filing pieces of paper with all manner of poor quality draft articles
intended for publication that will normally be thrown away. We do not
need to keep every last bit of digital diarrhoea from now until eternity.
The speedy deletion process on Wikipedia is pretty damn conservative, so
if they say it is rubbish then it is definitely rubbish.
Your efforts to archive deleted pages and promoting the process does
absolutely nothing to help Wikipedia.
Alan
On 8/07/2012 11:44 p.m., Mike Dupont wrote:
Hi there,
Telling a user that I took the effort to archive thier article is
considered spam? What if you are the author? Dont you have the right
to know?
See this :
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:John_doe_london&action=history
(cur | prev) 09:10, 8 July 2012 Mrmatiko (talk | contribs) . .
(4,816 bytes) (-158) . . (Undid revision 501206682 by Mdupont (talk)
spam) (undo)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mdupont#Promotional_edits
and my message back http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mrmatiko#Spam.3F
I have reverted the template to not have a link to the wikia, for now.
I would like some support for my project and protection to contact
users about the deleted articles.
thanks,
mike
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
