Depends on the explanation I suppose. But "reliable source" is jargon too, in many cases.
We do have difficulty communicating with non wikipedians. Not in a bad faith way; it is hard to communicate with others. I just think we are too quick to blame the subject for "not understanding us". When it cuts deeply both ways. Tom Morton On 8 Sep 2012, at 16:29, Charles Matthews <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 September 2012 15:43, Thomas Morton <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Wow high and mighty much? >> >> I haven't had chance to look into this; but I bet I know what I will >> find. Someone being a bit of a jerk to him, which has led to having to >> take this approach. > > > You might be justified in saying this if he was really told he wasn't > "credible". If he was told that he wasn't a "reliable source" in WP's > terms, that is a different kettle of fish. > > Charles > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
