On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Charles Matthews wrote:
You might be justified in saying this if he was really told he wasn't "credible". If he was told that he wasn't a "reliable source" in WP's terms, that is a different kettle of fish.
How's he supposed to know the difference? Besides, once he is verified to be himself, he is a reliable source. The issue was that he was a primary source and the secondary sources had preference. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
