On 8 March 2014 09:20, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 March 2014 22:04, Brian J Mingus <brian.min...@colorado.edu> wrote:
>> The article should reinstated, a section concerning the unique nature of >> its notability should be added. > This argument doesn't seem to convince (though that does resemble > reasonable popularity). The fourth AFD notes the problem in this case: > really crappy sources. The sort of thing that would lead me to !vote > "delete without prejudice". linkto:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baader-Meinhof_phenomenon in Google shows that it hits Reddit and apparently 4chan a bit. Apparently StumbleUpon likes it too. This would account for the hit rates - it's an amusing thing people would like there to be a name for, c.f. "The Meaning Of Liff" - but still doesn't supply us with sufficient material to base a solid article on. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
