On the source list it seems that all monuments are identified by its cadastre number and probably it is unique.
[1] http://www.ssmn.public.lu/legislation/maj-liste.pdf Vicenç > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:46:08 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Monuments without identifier > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:44:14AM -0700, Romaine Wiki wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > In the country Luxembourg we have monuments, but so far we know these > > monuments have no unique identifier. It seems an important aspect of the > > monument lists in other countries (Belgium, Netherlands, etc) that the > > photo's have an identifier so that they are easily matched with the > > monument lists. As we know nothing about unique identifiers, how do who > > solve that situation? > > > > - Should we leave the monuments without unique identifier? > > - Should we create our own unique identifier? Like one based on for example > > the community with us giving a number to a monument in the order of when a > > monument got listed? > > - Anyone a idea? > > Do all monuments have an adress? Can postalcode+streetnumber be unique enough > perhaps (like in NL). > > Regards, > > Andre > > > > Greetings - Romaine > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
