On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:36:59 +0400, Анастасия Львова <[email protected]> wrote: >> But just to mention it, the database has a number of typos (like the one >> you >> cite), what is more important, it has a big number of more serious >> errors - >> the monuments which are still protected by law and included in the >> database >> but do not factually exist. The point is that this is not so much an >> obstacle for running WLM, since hardly anybody would provide monuments of >> non-existing monuments, and if someone would, this could be a major >> success. (I think if we could collect in such a way free images of wooden >> churches burned in Arkhangelsk Oblast in 1970s-1980s it would be great). > Yes, I know about the base. That's why we started after proposition of > restriction of the territory only (and we choose the city which we > could check), that's why we have disclaimers and prooflinks on every > page with lists. > And we have not received an official response from the Ministry of > Culture with the momre correct base, although we did the request. >
OK, let us return to this issue in a week. I believe they just do not have a better database anyway. Cheers Yaroslav _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
