I agree. I'd actually extend the model a bit. This is ours, and what allows us to do:
1) monuments table - it is compatible with monuments_all/monuments_pt(pt) 2) objlinks - it has the wiki links we parsed from the object descriptions (name field in monuments_all) - this allows us to rebuild the lists preserving wiki links; 3) extinfo - extended info: coordinate sources, multiple systems external ids (IGESPAR vs. SIPA), image count and image lists (for an object) and, obviously, the commons category. In the end, we will be able to measure our progress, as you see it at: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org.pt/tools/stats/plataforma.php?&lang=en I believe this will be a lot of help in further WLM / Heritage projects as well as interconnect our partners with the outcomes of this experience. -- Nuno Tavares Wikimedia Portugal http://www.wikimedia.pt Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer. Participe também: http://www.wikimedia.pt Em 22-09-2011 11:24, André Costa escreveu: > Might it be worth adding a commons category to the Monuments database > (via the structured lists)? It's probably more relevant than the one > image that has been chosen for the image parameter. > > Andre/ Lokal_Profil > > On 19 September 2011 19:30, Maarten Dammers <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > That is correct! I still have to expand tha bot to work for other > countries....... > > Maarten > > Op 19 sep 2011 om 12:14 heeft Bas vb <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> het volgende geschreven:\ > >> I believe a/the bot automatically puts the pictures per city which >> are now >> in >> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Rijksmonumenten>http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Rijksmonumenten >> unless >> there's no ID present. >> >> Mvg, >> >> Bas >> >> > To: >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> > Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:57:00 +0400 >> > From: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> > Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] All images of a monument >> > >> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:48:36 +0200, Lodewijk >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > wrote: >> > > Hi Yaroslav, >> > > >> > > I think that expanding the image tree makes a lot of sense. >> However, >> > > perhaps >> > > it makes more sense to expand from Buildings in Middelburg - >> then to >> > > streets >> > > - then to houses. It would make more sense to me to have a >> category >> > > "Buildings in Middelburg", "Buildings in Lange Noordstraat, >> Middelburg" >> > and >> > > then "Lange Noordstraat 23, Middelburg". In very big cities, >> you might >> > want >> > > to add a layer of city-areas (in Amsterdam for example). >> > > >> > > However, I don't know what would be a useful threshold to create a >> > category >> > > (both for streets and per building) - perhaps a more >> experienced Commons >> > > user can make a useful suggestion to that. My gut feeling >> would be that >> > we >> > > would only create categories for five or more images, but I >> can be wrong >> > > there. >> > > >> > > Lodewijk >> > > >> > >> > I perfectly agree with everything you write, and five images was >> also my >> > personal suggestion for the threshold (I believe some exceptions >> can be >> > make for somehow famous buildings). Right now we have most of >> the images >> > sitting just in general categories "RM in the Netherlands" or at >> best "RM >> > in city X". There is a lot of work ahead of us to categorize >> them also >> > along usual lines like towns -> streets -> buildings. >> > >> > Cheers >> > Yaroslav >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> > >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> > >> >> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments>https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments >> > <http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu>http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments >> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
