2012/2/10 Platonides <[email protected]>: > On 10/02/12 11:54, Raul Kern wrote: >> Hallo, >> >> would like to add two new fileds to monuments_all table >> (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011/Monuments_database): >> >> >> article varchar(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' >> and >> registrant_url varchar(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '' >> >> >> article would contain wiki article title (in most cases the article >> about the monument) extracted from the name field -- first wikilink in >> the name field >> >> article would be formatted same as page_title in >> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Page_table -- i.e. spaces >> replaced with '_'. > > Whay about calling it monument article? I'm concerned about confusing > its meaning with the article holding the list (source field) > > >> registrant_url would contain registrant url of the monument, like >> http://www.culture.gouv.fr/public/mistral/merimee_fr?ACTION=CHERCHER&FIELD_1=REF&VALUE_1=PA00088517, >> http://register.muinas.ee/?menuID=monument&action=view&id=20875, etc > > Adding it to the local table, sure. I'm not so convinced about > monuments_all. Also note that in some cases there may be several > entities able to give 'monument status', and listing the same monument. > >
If registrant_url is added only to local table, can this field be used in API output. Would like to have the possibility to display the registrant_url's in the KML output... -- Raul _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.eu
