Hi, There is already several projects on Wikidata : - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_WLM - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Built_heritage
But, the definition of a "monument" varies a lot from country to country (for some countries, "monument" is a building, sometimes not ; for some countries, "monument" has to be old, sometimes not ; the only common international definition is "a monument is something designed as such by a country") . And laws vary even more, what you are allowed to take pictures of can be very different. If you take only France, Switzerland and Italy (three countries next to each others), you have : - no FOP in France, so you may have to wait up to 130 years after construction for the building to be photographed - FOP in Switzerland, you can take pictures of building built yesterday - strange situation in Italy where additional laws prevent you from taken pictures of buildings even if they are in the public domain (so it can be millennia old and still forbidden to photographed and pretty recent but allowed) It is still possible to have a less national approach on Commons for the upload (just one campaign instead of one for each country) but to judge each individual photo, you still need to know and take into account the country. Cheers, Nicolas Le lun. 22 janv. 2024 à 04:34, Kimmo Virtanen <kimmo.virta...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 11:34 PM Mykola Kozlenko <mycol...@ukr.net> wrote: >> > The heritage lists are also not a 'some degree' dependency but a major >> one: organising contest without lists will result in a mess of photos that >> someone needs to categorise manually. It's not easy to sort pictures from >> places you have never seen with descriptions in a language you don't >> understand. > > > Technically generating “lists” could be done to specify the international > data model for the monuments and required information in Wikidata so that > monuments will show up in competition-related tools (such as maps and > lists). With this approach, local editors could participate in improving > the data, and it can be self-organized. > > Examples from other Wikidata projects could be > > Wikiproject Sum of all paintings > * https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_sum_of_all_paintings > * > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_sum_of_all_paintings/Property_statistics > > Wikiproject Every Politician > * https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_every_politician > > Uniform monument data is also required to get better international tools > (maps, upload tools, statistics), so doing a data model is a good idea for > this reason. > > However, this is not a silver bullet for decentralization as the national > teams also do many other things, such as promoting the opening of the data > in the first place, doing the actual import for large datasets to wikidata, > communication, “helpdesk/tech-support,” etc. National teams are also in a > position where they can remove nationally recognized monuments from > competition lists when asked. Reviewing these requests requires local > knowledge. > > For example, one valid reason has been that the monuments could be damaged > if there were increased visitors because of visibility. Damaging could be > because of environmental wearing, illegal archeological diggings, stealing > metal for selling, illegal paintings/tagging, but also because there is a > danger that somebody would destroy it on purpose. This removing monuments > from the competition must be handled discreetly in global competition also. > > Thus I can hardly imagine how we can sustainably organise contests in >> places where local volunteers don't want to work on them. > > > I think that the key issue is not local volunteers who work as individuals > but if there can be a local team whose responsibility is to organize the > event and who is the local contact point for communication using their real > name and face. There are countries where this is not possible for > organizers because it is unsafe, for example, because Wikipedia editors are > prosecuted. From a practical point of view, the international situation > could also be too complex for the local team to organize a competition > successfully. > > Br, > -- Kimmo Virtanen / Zache > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 11:34 PM Mykola Kozlenko <mycol...@ukr.net> wrote: > >> Hi Richard, >> >> This is not really an unusual way: in fact, most of our campaigns are >> locally-based because of language and culture barriers. While Commons is >> multilingual, most discussions (including this one) happen in English, a >> language most people in the world actually don't speak. >> >> The heritage lists are also not a 'some degree' dependency but a major >> one: organising contest without lists will result in a mess of photos that >> someone needs to categorise manually. It's not easy to sort pictures from >> places you have never seen with descriptions in a language you don't >> understand. Thus I can hardly imagine how we can sustainably organise >> contests in places where local volunteers don't want to work on them. >> >> The only international heritage lists that exist are the UNESCO ones. I >> can imagine a campaign dedicated to UNESCO world heritage monuments in >> different countries. We had such an experience with UNESCO Biosphere >> Reserves for Wiki Loves Earth, which was moderately successful (a few >> hundred uploads and some interesting places that were not pictured before). >> It is something that can be attempted, but of course it cannot really >> replace Wiki Loves Monuments with its national contests. >> >> Mykola (User:NickK) >> Wiki Loves Monuments Ukraine & Wiki Loves Earth international team >> >> *21 січня 2024, 20:09:58, від "Pharos" <pharosofalexand...@gmail.com >> <pharosofalexand...@gmail.com>>: * >> >> I think some of the tensions might be reduced if WLM and similar >> photo drives were in future structured less around "national" contests, and >> "national" teams. This is a somewhat unusual way to organize activities in >> our movement, and I think alternatives might be possible, even as we rely >> to some degree on state heritage lists. >> >> Thanks, >> Richard >> (User:Pharos) >> >> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 4:50 AM Bodhisattwa <bodhisattwa.rg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Totally agreed with Alexey. We are not supposed to judge and sanction >> people based on what their governments are doing. Our focus should >> completely remain on how to digitally preserve built heritage of our >> regions in a better way, keeping aside geopolitical conflicts and >> differences. If we want to drag world politics and play UN here, then the >> "international" part of the competition will be gone soon as no country in >> this world is a piece of heaven fallen from the sky; geopolitical conflicts >> are everywhere, even if they are not visible as wars. >> >> WLM is a collaborative international project and it should welcome any >> country willing to document their heritage. There should be no exception! >> >> Regards, >> Bodhisattwa >> >> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024, 12:28 Aleksey Chalabyan <xelgen...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> I wanted to add my 2 cents, since I'll be at another wikimedia call and >> will miss this call (or most of it) and since last time I followed >> principle of least drama. >> >> I am seriously afraid stepping into this territory will open a Pandora's >> box with dozens of requests to exclude this or that country, arbitration of >> those requests etc, making organisation of WLM, WLE and any other >> international cooperation much, much less pleasent and if doable per se. It >> will fill more like all-against-all UN session or international court - >> then a collaborative, friendly place to make a wiki photo contest to get >> more free photos of monuments from every corner of the world. >> >> Unfortunately, there are many wars and conflicts, and many cultural >> genocides. Some get more media coverage, some less. But there will be a >> long line of countries to ban if we go there. And if we do - I personally, >> will add couple more countries to the top of the list, with a sound proofs >> of decades of cultural genocide done by them. >> >> Also there are countries with great track of preserving monuments, even >> if those are of another culture/religion, no wars started in centuries, but >> very poor track record of human rights in general, and let's say woman and >> LGBT rights in particular. Are those countries "good enough to play with >> us" or not? >> >> How about cases where monuments are preserved but culturally apropriated? >> How about millitary suppliers and military allies of countries we'll ban? >> How about countries where UNESCO officials were caught bribed by regimes to >> cover up acts of cultural genocide? How about UNESCO itself? >> How far do we go in our Wiki Loves Justice campaign? >> >> I mention no country name now on purpose, to preserve comfortable >> collaborative environment and not make anyone feel like they needs to >> defend themselves. I believe any true Wikimedian in good standing should >> feel safe and comfortable here for our international cooperation to be >> possible. Even if their governments and military do unforgivable and >> unforgettable crimes - as we speak, or a year, 10 or 100 years ago. >> >> That's not how and where we should punish those governments and regimes. >> And let's be frank they won't care. We'd just go far away from our mission >> and make our lives worse - less fun and less meaningful, and the only part >> we'd punish will be victims on the other side. >> >> P.S. Sorry for long letter, was short on time. (c) >> >> Love and peace, >> Aleksey a.k.a Xelgen >> >> 2024 թ. հնվ 21, կիր, 5:07 effe iets anders <effeietsand...@gmail.com> >> օգտատերը գրել է․ >> >> Hi Illia, >> >> thanks for letting us know. I understand the constraints you must be >> dealing with, and I wish we could have announced this earlier (not limited >> to your situation - this is desirable for other reasons too). Please know >> that it was not our intention to announce it last minute, but that we >> realized too late that time was running out for this in the way I >> explained. Hopefully we can indeed better meet the timeliness expectations >> going forward. >> >> Lodewijk >> >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:04 PM Ilya Korniyko <intra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Lodewijk, >> >> WLM Ukraine's organizing team is interested in this discussion, but it's >> difficult to find time for it on such a short notice -- because of the >> armed conflict most Ukrainian Wikimedians have to simultaneously fit into >> their agendas their main work, Wikimedia volunteering and activities we >> have to do because of the war. For example, I have an emergency casualty >> care training this Sunday, and another team member cannot join because she >> goes to a training area for drills on the same day. >> >> We ask that you take these circumstances into consideration and notify us >> in advance in the future. >> >> Regards, >> Illia >> >> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 2:23 AM effe iets anders < >> effeietsand...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> (with apologies for the delay in sending this announcement) >> This email discusses a sensitive topic of armed conflict, and may contain >> triggers for some of our community members. While we appreciate your input, >> please prioritize your own mental wellbeing and don't feel obligated to >> respond or participate. I have tried to frame this as sensitively as >> possible, but welcome constructive suggestions on how to do this better >> off-list. >> >> *Summary*: On Sunday 21 January (08:00 PST, 16:00 UTC), the >> international team of Wiki Loves Monuments will organize an office >> hour/community conversation on: How should an international federated photo >> competition like WLM handle national teams, international finalists and >> communication in the case of geopolitical armed conflict. We will announce >> the link later, and you can register here: >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2023/Office_hour >> >> >> *Topic*: In the past years, our communities have been confronted with >> the question how to deal with a number of geopolitical armed conflicts. >> This question came up in the past years in a few different ways: whether >> photos of heritage from certain countries should be allowed to be >> represented or compete in international competitions like Wiki Loves >> Monuments, whether and how photos of heritage in disputed areas can >> participate (especially when that dispute becomes an armed conflict) and >> there are probably more ways ahead that various armed conflicts can make an >> international competition and communication about the competition complex. >> There is no question whether human and cultural destruction is desirable, >> and every war is likely one too many. >> >> *Why now*: It is particularly hard to discuss these sensitive topics >> when they are current: it is a painful conversation for everyone to have, >> especially because the people who are living through the real-life >> consequences are given an additional burden of engaging in these >> discussions, under the pressure of time. >> >> For this reason I believe it would be helpful to discuss this topic >> without focusing on a specific conflict - but rather to discuss principles. >> How would we, generally speaking, international competitions such as Wiki >> Loves Monuments like to be influenced by armed conflict? Are there >> guidelines that they could maintain? At this point, we don't know who the >> winners of Wiki Loves Monuments are, and we can still have an abstract >> conversation. I don't expect this conversation to conclude right away, but >> hope that we can continue it in a few months after the dust of the winning >> images has settled. >> >> While this is already very soon, we have settled on Sunday 21 January, >> 16:00 UTC to avoid getting too close to the announcement of international >> winners. >> >> *Framing*: Some questions that come to mind as useful conversation >> starters would include: >> * Under what conditions could or should a national team be disqualified >> from participating in an international federated activity such as WLM? >> * If yes, who should make the decision whether to disqualify, and using >> what criteria? Who should they consult? >> * Under what conditions could or should the national submissions be >> disqualified, if a national competition already has taken place? >> * Should the international team make efforts to not appear to support an >> armed conflict when communicating about the competition, or even previous >> events? What are some guidelines that they could follow? >> >> I would invite others to contribute in framing a constructive >> conversation (publicly or privately - when in doubt, just email me >> privately). >> >> *Conversation timeline*: We want this to be the start of a constructive >> community conversation with national organizers, international organizers >> and other community members who feel they can constructively contribute. We >> welcome contributions from organizers of other similar international >> competitions/activities. The conversation will be in English but if there >> is sufficient interest, we can see if we can organize translation resources >> in future conversations. You can sign up here: >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2023/Office_hour >> . Please do sign up, in case we have to share the link privately. >> >> As mentioned, I don't expect this conversation to be "one and done". It's >> a first step, and I expect to follow up with a next conversation in a few >> months, and again around Wikimania - if there is sufficient interest. >> >> I will guide this conversation as a former WLM international team member >> and a current advisor. >> >> Warmly, >> Lodewijk >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> wikilovesmonuments-le...@lists.wikimedia.org >> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> wikilovesmonuments-le...@lists.wikimedia.org >> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> wikilovesmonuments-le...@lists.wikimedia.org >> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> wikilovesmonuments-le...@lists.wikimedia.org >> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> wikilovesmonuments-leave@lists.wikimedia.orghttp://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> wikilovesmonuments-le...@lists.wikimedia.org >> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to > wikilovesmonuments-le...@lists.wikimedia.org > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list To unsubscribe send an email to wikilovesmonuments-le...@lists.wikimedia.org http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
