Fortunately, next year everything will be live streamed and available
immediately.



<https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Brainstorming#Live_broadcastin
g>

-- 
Jan Ainali

Bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige: 100 kr till bankgiro 5822-9915 (skriv
"Medlemsavgift, namn, adress och epost")

<http://se.wikimedia.org>
On 29 aug 2013 08:12 "Kolossos" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can live with fixed quality, also two years later I don't need a
> higher quality. For me important is that the videos are available
> relatively soon. This increase the impact a talk can have in the
> community.
> 
> Nobody is interested at a talk that is an half year old.
> 
> I learn in the OpenStreetMap community the way to make this possible
> for
> conferences[1]. The video are available 1-3 days after the
> presentation.
> The solution is to cut the video from the presenter and the slides
> during the talk and compress everything in real time. So it's possible
> to do this for volunteers.
> 
> I hope we will have such a system next year, this would increase the
> impact of the whole Wikimania. If it cost money to have a system for
> so
> many tracks, I'm sure that it's a good investment for the project.
> 
> Greetings Tim alias Kolossos
> 
> [1]
> FOSSGISS conference:
> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FOSSGIS_2013#Videos%20und%20Folien
> >
> SOTM-US conference:
> <http://vimeopro.com/openstreetmapus/state-of-the-map-us-2013/>
> System at FOSSGIS: <http://www.boinx.com/boinxtv/overview/>
> 
> Am 29.08.2013 05:31, schrieb Matthew Flaschen:
> > On 08/28/2013 09:12 PM, Nkansah Rexford wrote:
> > > I'm wondering who will dedicate 10+Gig of his data plan to watch
> > > an hour
> > > video of Wikimania in HDV.
> > 
> > No one, since Commons downscales it automatically (no matter what
> > size
> > you upload in).
> > 
> > > If the end user needs a SD quality of video, why use HDV to
> > > record? I'm
> > > sure HDV isn't used because its the latest technology or something
> > > of
> > > that sort.
> > 
> > It's standard procedure to record in higher quality than viewers
> > will
> > watch in. Among other things, it provides editing flexibility, and
> > allows archiving the high quality content (whether at Archive.org,
> > Commons (depending on size), or somewhere else. Then later, if file
> > size limits change, or people want higher quality (e.g. for a BluRay
> > or
> > something), you can remaster from a high quality recording.
> > 
> > Matt Flaschen
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimania-l mailing list
> > <[email protected]>
> > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> <[email protected]>
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l>
> 
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l

Reply via email to