Sounds good!
But we still have the problem with the question, that there are
different ideas about whether lecturers have to be asked first if they
want to appear as live stream and then to YouTube with their
presentation. And certainly the somewhat strange idea that one should be
discriminated against someone because of that, if he don´ want to be
videotaped.
h
Am 15.04.2014 11:17, schrieb Edward Saperia:
I believe this Wikimania will be different. Our videos will be higher
quality, and livestreamed and uploaded same day by a dedicated team.
The videos will be broadcast by our media partners. We have a larger
number of featured speakers who have their own audiences, that will
attract people to the rest of the video content. The livestreams will
be promoted via a centralnotice. Finally, the event itself is simply
much larger.
*Edward Saperia*
Chief Coordinator Wikimania London <http://www.wikimanialondon.org>
email <mailto:[email protected]>•facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/edsaperia>•twitter
<http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia>• 07796955572
133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG
On 15 April 2014 09:57, Hegger <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Wikimania 2013, 125 Videos with an average access rate of 12.
Even the video of Jimbo was with 11 calls below the average. Of
what value are you talking about? From a theoretical value?
The polling numbers for 2012 were slightly higher, but even they
are beyond any comprehensible value.
What then are we talking about?
I see no rea value, which can be facing the not inconsiderable
costs. We should strive to turn to more practice. This tells us
that videos are totally
overvalued.
You, Dschwen, should not compare your own situation as a U.S.
resident with thousands of other Wikipedians, which probably would
be able to give a talk in their own language, but not in a foreign
language. The same applies to all other persons who are not able
to follow a complex lecture in English. Not even on video.
And you will not find anyone who will make subtitles in videos,
which are just accessed 100 times in the best case.
To be a little provocative to say: Forget about the videos, these
serve more the coverage and vanity of the speakers themselves.
H
Am 14.04.2014 17:53, schrieb Daniel Schwen:
If yes, then think about more than 70% of not native english speakers, which
don´t. Even if they can follow a presentation or a panel. And you mean, they
should be punished for that?
I don't quite see the connection to what Jan said here. Nobody wants
to punish non native speakers. Is there a correlation between being a
non-native speaker and not wanting to be filmed?
I have to agree with jan that submissions that decline being video
taped _should_ indeed be punished (to pick up on that hyperbole). The
reason is simple. These contributors are providing less value by not
being taped. They are effectively "punishing" people that are unable
to attend the conference physically. We wouldn't be getting as much
out of their talks as we possibly could.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
