Can we move on to something else ?
Concerns have been raised, answers have been given. If there are needs for
more clarification can it happens in more private emails ?

2015-07-31 14:09 GMT+02:00 Stuart Prior <stuartpriorw...@gmail.com>:

> Nicholas,
>
> Yes it's a fair point. I can't speak for previous committees, but I know
> this year we did take it into account when reviewing applications.
>
> But in any community there will be a few consistently excellent people
> that make a good case to justify support year on year. As the scholarship
> committee rotates members, and I made sure to avoid having members mark
> those they had more personal connections with, I hope we were as objective
> as we could be.
>
> I could go on, but I'll leave it there. However I'd just like to reiterate
> that the scholarship process does not exclude "regular Wikimedians" in the
> slightest, quite the opposite.
>
> Best
>
> Stuart Prior
> User:Battleofalma
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Nicholas Bashour <
> nicholasbash...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe that what Praveen may be saying is that he thinks the value
>> that a repeat scholarship recipient can gain from coming back to wikimania
>> numerous times is outweighed by the value that someone who has never been
>> to wikimania but has nevertheless been a very involved wikimedian can gain
>> from attending. Therefore, given that there are limited resources,
>> scholarships should always go to the people who can gain the most from
>> receiving them, which Praveen may be arguing will always be someone who has
>> never been to wikimania versus someone who has. He's saying that despite
>> having many repeat scholarship recipients, there has not been any added
>> value on wiki to justify that, and therefore new recipients should be
>> actively prioritized over repeat ones. That's not to say whether or not
>> that's actually the case or that this was the point he was trying to
>> convey, but rather what I understood his argument to be.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Nicholas
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> Am 31.07.2015 um 07:39 schrieb Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexf...@gmail.com
>> >:
>>
>> I just want to know why some users were able to achieve scholarship again
>>> and again while regular Wikimedians being excluded.
>>>
>>
>> And that is EXACTLY what Stuart explained. I understood, unless you
>> didn't!
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday 31 July 2015 04:01 PM, Stuart Prior wrote:
>>>
>>> Praveen,
>>>
>>> I was chair of the Scholarship Committee for this year.
>>>
>>> It's unfortunate that you didn't get a scholarship, however there were
>>> many high quality applications and sometimes the difference between success
>>> and failure is very small, and I feel genuinely bad for any Wikimedian with
>>> a good application that didn't make it, but it's very competitive.
>>>
>>> We do take into account previous scholarship awards, and focus on making
>>> sure new people get a chance. But consistently good applications and
>>> excellent work can warrant repeat scholarship awards despite this.
>>>
>>> In some cases where people have been granted Scholarships previously but
>>> have been unable to attend the conference due to visa issues we have
>>> considered that when receiving their applications for the current year.
>>>
>>> I won't comment on any individual's scholarship, but "regular
>>> Wikimedians" certainly make up the bulk of the scholars. Edit count is not
>>> the only factor, but it still is a significant (and clearly verifiable)
>>> factor when looking at someone's application.
>>>
>>> However, we looked for organisers too. Some of our community are better
>>> facilitators and community builders than they are editors, and running
>>> events, training and building partnerships are things that were marked
>>> favourably.
>>>
>>> Moreover, two identical applicants can make wildly differing
>>> applications. We look for those that comprehensively demonstrate their
>>> contributions and qualify their statements.
>>>
>>> Please apply again next year. You have just as much opportunity as
>>> anyone else.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Stuart Prior
>>> User:Battleofalma
>>>
>>> On 31 July 2015 at 09:16, Dariusz Jemielniak <dar...@alk.edu.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Praveen,
>>>>
>>>> I've been a steward, as well as the chair of the FDC for three years,
>>>> so you may assume I've been somewhat active in Wikimedia movement. I did
>>>> not receive a global scholarship neither (although I did eventually go, as
>>>> I got elected to the Board of Trustees).
>>>>
>>>> I think it is clearly an assumption of bad faith to say that there is a
>>>> bias in scholarship committee. The criteria are explicit, and obviously
>>>> with limited resources a large number of excellent candidates, even with
>>>> accepted presentations, will not make it.
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest you focus on Wikimedia activity, prepare a great
>>>> presentation for the next year as well as a compelling application, and try
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> DJ "pundit"
>>>> 31 lip 2015 10:07 "praveenp" <me.prav...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please don't derail the actual topic of the thread. I really didnt
>>>>> assume such an interpretation from quoting his words. Whenever I asked
>>>>> about the issue to anybody, I generally got such a reply, which I want to
>>>>> avoid here.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it is need to start a new thread, I will do that. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> But please tell me why some people regularly get scholarships atleast
>>>>> since 2008, active (in Wikimedia projects / outreach programms) users 
>>>>> never
>>>>> get a chance to share their experience and problems at Wikimania.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Praveen. P
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday 31 July 2015 12:40 PM, WereSpielChequers wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Praveen,
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether there was anything personal or confidential in Gerard's
>>>>> private emails to you is for him to say not for you to decide.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 31 Jul 2015, at 05:59, praveenp <me.prav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Osmar Valdebenito,
>>>>> No offense was intended :-(. For prominent communities that may be
>>>>> true, but could you check list of users who got scholarship from Malayalam
>>>>> community.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Amir Ladsgroup,
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) As you can see there is nothing confidential or personal in Gerards
>>>>> reply. He just gave a summary of "known" practices.
>>>>> 2) Users are not asking for trophies. They also want to participate
>>>>> Wikimania and share and get the experience.
>>>>> 3) Wikimedia projects are community processes. I simply don't
>>>>> understand how granting scholarship to same persons again and again for
>>>>> five or six years help that process. I also dont understand that
>>>>> communication and sharing of multiple viewpoints, ideas and practices is
>>>>> possible in the above scenario.
>>>>> 4) Yes; If clicking tick marks in translatewiki on some 500 string in
>>>>> 5 minutes before applying for scholarship (as reviewing the translation) 
>>>>> is
>>>>> a prominent contribution.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the beginning every body treated equal, we have multiple
>>>>> participants (with understandable reasons) for Wikimania. It started to
>>>>> shrink later and now people plainly believe granting scholarship is an act
>>>>> of favoritism. I also want to prove I am wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Praveen. P
>>>>> User:Praveenp
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: Mail striped because mailman held my previous reply claiming "
>>>>> Message body is too big:"
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday 31 July 2015 05:03 AM, Amir Ladsgroup wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> There are several issues I want to comment:
>>>>> 1-First of all. Do you have permission from Gerard to publish your
>>>>> conversation? Maybe there is something confidential in it, Did you care to
>>>>> check?
>>>>> 2- Scholarship is not award or trophy, bear that in mind.
>>>>> 3- People are expected to come here and learn, communicate, etc.
>>>>> that's why a same person gets scholarship,
>>>>> 4- No one's wife got scholarship because of being wife of someone.
>>>>> They probably are prominent contributors too.
>>>>> 5- Check my first question and answer that. (Emphasizing)
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:05 AM Osmar Valdebenito <
>>>>> b1mbo.wikipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, but when I read "No regular Wikimedian get any scholarship", I
>>>>>> stopped reading.
>>>>>> It is not only a lie, but also very unfair to all the extremely great
>>>>>> Wikimedians that attended and made great contributions in Wikimania, and
>>>>>> also the volunteers that have helped now and in the past reviewing and
>>>>>> evaluated thousand of applications in the Scholarship Committee.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>>>>> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimania-l mailing 
>>>>> listWikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>>>>> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>>>> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimania-l mailing 
>>> listWikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> +Rexford <http://google.com/+Nkansahrexford> | khophi.co
>> <http://khophi.co/about>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
>


-- 
Pierre-Selim
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l

Reply via email to