Or, if you want to start any topics of discussion for the meetup at the
WikiConference, see:
http://wikiconferenceusa.org/wiki/Cascadia_Meetup

Jason


On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Jason Moore <[email protected]>wrote:

> Glad to see interest in formal organization. Perhaps we can continue this
> conversation at Meta?
>
> I, too, think we could have a successful application to obtain user group
> status. This would mean official recognition from the Wikimedia Foundation,
> provides funding opportunities, and is a step towards chapter status.
> Before we worry about bylaws, etc., I think we should focus on user group
> recognition.
>
> Pine, Mako, would you two be interested in being co-contacts for the
> Wikimedia Cascadia user group? I can be one, too, which makes three
> already.  I had hoped to get some people together for an in-person Cascadia
> meetup at the upcoming WikiConference USA, perhaps for the purpose of
> putting together a user group plan.  Perhaps this is easier to do remotely
> since there is already interest.
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 5:25 PM, ENWP Pine <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  I may have some time in the next few weeks to get us more organized on
>> Meta. Becoming a user group looks relatively lightweight and I think we
>> would qualify if we put in an application. Of course, anyone else who wants
>> to curate the Meta pages and submit a user group application can do so!
>>
>> If we start to do regular business, especially with people outside the
>> immediate Wikimedia volunteer community or if we start to accept grant
>> money, I think we should incorporate for liability protection and tax
>> reporting reasons. Being an unincorporated nonprofit association that gets
>> sued, such as because someone in our group made a copyright violation,
>> would be bad. Also, incorporation may provide us more ability to get grants
>> and in-kind contributions especially if we qualify for 501(c)(3).
>> Incorporation is not difficult but it involves some time for applications
>> to be created and processed. What gets tricky is selecting board members,
>> drafting bylaws, and doing other necessary administrative work beyond the
>> capacity of volunteers, so we'll need to think about that when the time
>> comes. We are small enough now that all active participants could be board
>> members, but if we scale to 30 members we will likely need an elected
>> board. That is a good problem to have, and the Affiliations Committee can
>> provide guidance for us throughout the organizing process.
>>
>>
>> http://nonprofit.about.com/od/faqsthebasics/f/unincorporationassociation.htm
>>
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affcom
>>
>> Pine
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-Cascadia mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-cascadia
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-Cascadia mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-cascadia

Reply via email to