On 17 June 2012 15:43, Andrew Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
> As there are no major and well-used forks at all, we can't reasonably > draw inferences of the desirability of a specific project from its > non-existence - we simply don't have the information to make that > conclusion. This applies whether the hypothetical fork is one using an > image filter, one using stable versions, one using peer-review > editorial control, one dynamically switching between varieties of > English, or anything else... I haven't seen those being shouted for like this is. That is, there are people actually asking for this, and there aren't really for those other things. So I think my question - if this is so obviously the right thing, then where are the existing attempts? - still stands as relevant. - d. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
