On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Tobias Oelgarte < [email protected]> wrote:
> Am 18.06.2012 16:31, schrieb Thomas Morton: > >> We don't have much data on what our readers want; but a not insignificant >> > portion of them, at least, are concerned with controversial images >> (nudity, Mohammed, etc.). I fully advocate finding out what the community >> thinks; but when I raised this issue before it was snorted at with >> something along the lines of "the readers aren't the driving force here". >> >> *sigh* >> >> I asked for the same thing and got no response as well. We had the > referendum which had big flaws,[1] but not a single neutral survey directed > at the readers under the light that our community is most likely biased... > > [1] explained in length at http://meta.wikimedia.org/** > wiki/Talk:Image_filter_**referendum/en<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Image_filter_referendum/en> That's one point we seem to agree on. I asked the same question a year ago – why did nobody survey the reading public, or the donors? A _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
