On 3 July 2012 20:05, Philippe Beaudette <[email protected]> wrote: > And that's precisely why we would like a global ban policy implemented. We > would prefer an established, community-monitored process that we can turn > to when at all possible (and make no mistake, in this case it was needed; I > wish we could give all the specifics, but for privacy reasons, we just > can't). Because we didn't have that, we had to break new ground with the > Office actions policy. I hope we never have to use that again.
How will a community-monitored process deal with cases where the specifics can't be published due to privacy reasons? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
