On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 July 2012 20:05, Philippe Beaudette <[email protected]> wrote: >> And that's precisely why we would like a global ban policy implemented. We >> would prefer an established, community-monitored process that we can turn >> to when at all possible (and make no mistake, in this case it was needed; I >> wish we could give all the specifics, but for privacy reasons, we just >> can't). Because we didn't have that, we had to break new ground with the >> Office actions policy. I hope we never have to use that again. > > How will a community-monitored process deal with cases where the > specifics can't be published due to privacy reasons? >
Would it be possible for the Ombudsman commission to take a look and take an official stance? It's not what they signed up for, but it's closeish. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
