Wikipedia-l is not the most active of lists, to put it mildly. Those interested in discussing the potential advantages and drawbacks of a Wikipedia without press sources and coming up with some ideas for a feasible compromise are advised that there is a related thread on Wikipediocracy, at http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=600
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012, Samuel Klein wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:21 AM, The Cunctator > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > Just think, in a few years we can set up the site to construct drafts for > > the site that constructs drafts for Wikipedia. > > > > Oh yes. It will be called Wikiwikiwiki, with "Jam On It" playing every > time you load the main page. > > <moving to wikipedia-l as suggested> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
