On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:25 AM, ENWP Pine <[email protected]> wrote:
> With that in mind, and since the current state of the RFC on your > proposal, roughly nine days after commenting began, is about 50% for and > 50% against in its current form, I would like to offer to work with you on > revitalizing the > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Global_requests_committeeproposal > for a successor RFC, taking into account the comments on that page > and at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Global_bans, > any comments from Philippe about how this committee might be structured in > such a way that WMF would trust it to handle ban requests from the office, > and comments from anyone else who’d like to give input. > > Thank you, > Hi Pine, Following up on this post-Wikimania, it's clear that the nearly 50/50 trend is continuing, even after the community decided to split the "policy needs edits" and "no, I hate this idea" groups apart. In light of that, I am happy to work on alternatives, though to be totally honest the broader scope of the global requests committee makes it more challenging and difficult a task, and perhaps something that should be done with more collaboration with other groups at the Foundation, etc. Thanks for your thoughtful suggestions, as always. Steven _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
