On 29 July 2012 03:32, Risker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 29 July 2012 03:16, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Keegan Peterzell, 29/07/2012 08:29: >> >> For editing, that is. I have what I presume to be my obituary on the >>> wiki: >>> http://wikimediafoundation.**org/wiki/User:Kpeterzell<http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:Kpeterzell> >>> >> >> The situation of WMFwiki is indeed frustrating, but could we avoid OT in >> this thread? Unless it's a subtle strategy to make the thread useful and >> make people go to <https://meta.wikimedia.org/** >> wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_budget#**2012-13<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_budget#2012-13>> >> (which I'll now try to link from the main page and what not if it isn't). >> >> > > Never mind - that links to a historical page. I have started the new page > here: > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2012-13_Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan >
> Risker/Anne > Well, despite my best efforts, the discussion has been redirected back to < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_budget#2012-13> In other words, it is now on the bottom of a discussion page that has not been touched in 3 years simply because it says something about the WMF budget. I'm sorry, but whenever we're having a discussion about $46 million, I think it deserves its own page. Not to mention the fact that this annual plan (which is a bit different than a budget) isn't even in the same league as the ones from 2004-2009. Nothing on the actual Wikimedia budget page[1] is up to date, and it doesn't even include the links that Tilman started this thread with. Perhaps a bit more budget in the area of community engagement is called for here. Risker/Anne [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_budget - last edit March 2009 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
