On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Keegan Peterzell <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I would like to see this become an open part of Meta. It is traditional > > meta-work, and rewarding to improve and revisit regularly. > > I disagree. Strategy work is Wikimedia Foundation's focus planning. Meta > is Wikimedia projects. I think it's important to delineate the two. > Have you reread the proposals on the Strategy wiki recently? Most are by and about the projects. You can argue over whether the 5-yr strategic plan that was based on that work in 2010 was simply for the WMF's part in the movement, or for the movement as a whole... But the vast majority of the work done there was thinking and planning for the future of the projects. Which is traditionally Meta material. I agree that different organizations drawing from shared strategic brainstorming should clearly delineate their plans from those of other groups in the movement. That doesn't require a different wiki for every organization with a plan. A simple style guide for plans should suffice. Sam. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
