On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Bence Damokos <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Bishakha, > > In my opinion, given the generally curious nature of our movement, it might > be a good idea to make more preparatory material for the board meetings > available publicly in advance. > Not necessarily as a way to allow comments or input, but as a matter of > transparency. Especially for proposals that are not likely to be changed > during the meeting (e.g. the technical bylaw amendments) and that will > become public as a result of the board vote, it might be possible to > publish them in advance without any adverse consequences, and resulting in > greater transparency. > > (In this regard, the fact that Sue's recommendations were on Meta already > was a great step; without knowing the exact deliberations that happened at > the meeting, probably the bylaw amendments and the committee charters could > have been made public in advance.) > > Fair point. And kudos to Sue for creating her recommendations on Meta. But I do (now speaking personally) actually agree with your larger point, and this is something we will discuss on the Board and, hopefully, take on board more fully. Bishakha _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
