> Your posts are assuming a ridiculous degree of bad faith, where you > you start from your own confusion and extrapolate downwards....
"we've stopped fundraising this year" -- December 21 http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fundraising_2012&diff=4885494&oldid=4884949 "we're hoping to reach our US$25 million goal in the next few days" -- December 14 http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2012-December/123043.html Essentially equivalent comments have been made to me in private. For those outside of the U.S., http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Wikimedia-Foundation-Reviews-E38331.htm (2.8, 55%) should resolve correctly. Because Glassdoor is susceptible to sour grapes, it is probably best read in comparison to similar nearby companies. For example: http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/WIKIA-Reviews-E428648.htm (4.5, 100%) http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Google-Reviews-E9079.htm (4.0, 90%) http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Facebook-Reviews-E40772.htm (4.6, 94%) http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Twitter-Reviews-E100569.htm (3.7, 56%) http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Apple-Reviews-E1138.htm (3.9, 82%) http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Oracle-Reviews-E1737.htm (3.2, 63%) http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Intuit-Reviews-E2293.htm (3.7, 79%) http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Adobe-Reviews-E1090.htm (3.7, 84%) http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/VMware-Reviews-E12830.htm (3.3, 63%) I hope the Board and leadership find some way to exceed the employee satisfaction scores of at least one of those nine others in the coming year. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
