Jan-Bart de Vreede wrote: >... I do want to make sure you (and everyone else) realise that there is no >FACT like the one that you mention. > > "fact that the >> Foundation's policy of paying below market salary discriminates >> against potential hires with large expenses such as kids in college or >> a mortgage from 2007?" > > because > a) there is no such policy....
So would you disagree with Erik Moeller's statement of 29 December 2012? "[WMF compensation is] below some companies that are similar to us, notably Mozilla which is structured as a for-profit owned by a non-profit and pays market-level compensation (sans equity). Wikimedia is above most non-profits that do tech work, and there's a fair bit of room to grow compensation-wise for an entry-level hire. It's not what people could make elsewhere, and that's understood by folks who make it through the process." -- http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2012-December/123272.html > Finally I find the idea of restraining people to talk about salary > almost comical.... Would you post the text of the non-disparagement clause referred to at http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/April_5-7,_2008#Non-disparagement_and_confidentiality_agreement and http://uk.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Water_cooler&diff=19657&oldid=19653 please, so we can see exactly what it says? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
