Dariusz Jemielniak, 18/03/2013 10:33:
It is not about being a business or not - it is about basics of strategic planning. Comparisons for endowments undoubtedly should be made to non-business organizations, but the horizon for strategic planning is not determined as much by the profit/non-profit nature of our organization, but rather by the nature of the industry we're in. It just does not make much sense to create strategies and visions 100 years into the future in our case.
I disagree. The "horizon for strategic planning" in the case of business is just making profit, so you can build dams or power plants with a 50 or 100 years timeframe in mind, sell them all ten years later to buy banks or other big factories in a new sector and start again (cf. creation of Enel as told by Paul Ginsborg). That's exactly the opposite of what donors want for an endowment, and the point you're missing in your last reply to his point: it's reasonable to be unable to produce a meaningful long-term strategic plan for the sort of activities and objectives that the WMF has, but not for Wikimedia in general. In fact in <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Trust> I defined the aim as *negation* (or rather, the complement) of the 5-years strategic plan; more on the page.
Nemo _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
