thanks for these three examples. All relate to innovation breakthroughs (the main goal for strategy is achieving something completely technologically impossible, and not movement growth/sustenance). They are interesting though - let me know if you come up with something else :) For now I think we can mute this dispute, as it diverts from the endowment issue.
best, dj On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Fae <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18 March 2013 13:24, Dariusz Jemielniak <[email protected]> wrote: > > Fine, let's call it strategy. Off-the-record, can you name some other > > organizations, preferably more or less in our industry, which have > > strategies longer than 20 years? > > Google it - some random reading: > * 100 year project > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2199247/The-100-year-Starship-project-plans-transport-humans-solar-system.html > * 100 year plan > http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Industry/Unigen-pens-100-year-plan > * 100 year plan http://www.cnv.org/server.aspx?c=3&i=541 > * 100 year scenario planning > > http://www.computerweekly.com/opinion/Technology-in-the-next-100-years-the-futurologists-view > * How Google and Virgin wanted to be on Mars in 100 years > http://www.google.com/virgle/plan_1.html :-D > > A business search might discover some more down to earth long term > strategy examples. If this gets a bit more serious, I might spend a > couple of hours in the British Library business center tracking some > down. > > Cheers, > Fae > -- > [email protected] http://j.mp/faewm > Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/mfae > > > -- __________________________ dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak profesor zarządzania kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego i centrum badawczego CROW Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego http://www.crow.alk.edu.pl _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
