Hi Mathieu, Debian's Open Use Logo policy is a good example to consider.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Mathieu Stumpf <[email protected]> wrote: Attribution correction : the quote below is from Marc P. > Le 2013-03-19 19:59, Samuel Klein a écrit : << [On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 12:32 PM, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:] >> >> Making sure nobody can use a mark for bad reasons *means* having to okay >> proposed uses. If you want something "everyone can use without asking >> for any reason", you'll get something everyone *will* use for reasons >> you wish they wouldn't -- and then have no way to stop them. > > > It seems like schizophrenic wishes. If you want something "everyone can use > without asking for any reason", then you do also want something everyone can > use even if you don't like what they do with it. > > To bring more constructive comments, the more relevant similar case I am > aware of is the debian policy on their official logo. Here are some relevant > links : > http://www.debian.org/logos/ > http://www.debian.org/trademark > https://lwn.net/Articles/509124/ > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02503.html > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16135 > > -- > Association Culture-Libre > http://www.culture-libre.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l -- Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
