Yes, but it might be nice if we could let people pay trusted editors to improve articles (without a COI and with a NPOV) that normally wouldn't get attention.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Deryck Chan <[email protected]>wrote: > Because we've decided that [[WP:Ownership of articles]] is wrong, and > wronger if there's financial sponsorship involved. > > On 29 March 2013 22:36, Strainu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've just seen an OTRS ticket asking why isn't Wikipedia giving its > > pages for "adoption" (like when you adopt a page and your name ends up > > on its cage or something like that). I've moved the ticket to the > > donations queue, but I was wondering if this has ever been > > discussed/considered before. > > > > Thanks, > > Strainu > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
