Le 2013-03-30 20:51, Steven Walling a écrit :
There's actually plenty of even more neutral ways to do this IMO, and
none
of them have anything to do with promoting the donor or paid editing.
For
example: a simple count of how many readers donated in support of
this
article. "This article sponsored by 70 Wikipedia readers like you.
Contribute today by editing or donating." Or something like that.
No. First, you'll also need to put how many person edited the article,
how many times it was edited, and blablabla numbers. Not only could it
prevent new useful edits (oh it was already so much raffined, how could
I dare edit it), but it would probably encourage "let's make this
article have a big edit count" useless contributions.
Now I don't understand, do we have suddely so much need for paid edit?
I mean, sure I would love spending my days "improving" wikipedia and
other wikimedia projects, being paid for that. Give me a median salary,
and I sign right now, and I'm sure I won't be alone here. But I also
would be serriously affraid that it could harm the movement, which I
thing is far more important than my personal pleasure of being a full
time editor.
--
Association Culture-Libre
http://www.culture-libre.org/
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
