Typical. They were not willing to tell our legal counsel why or what was classified; she, of course, has no French security clearance; now it is spread all over an administrators noticeboard, and restored.
They weren't wrong but neither is our legal counsel or the users; so "fell between the cracks." Hopefully the matter was not too important; I'm sure we have enough money to pay for relocating the facility to a secure location. Fred > This is where the discussion is happening on-wiki: > http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Bulletin_des_administrateurs#Secret_d.C3.A9fense > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Fred Bauder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hard to know what was involved from the information you provide. The problem is there is classified information that amounts to nothing and then there is classified information release of which can cause serious damage. Defiance will eventually result in serious trouble. Not that we should knuckle under to nonsense. >> >> Fred >> >> > Hi there, >> > I guess you might be interested to hear that Direction Centrale du Renseignement Intérieur (Central Directorate of Interior >> Intelligence, >> > DCRI), a French intelligence agency that reports directly to the Ministry of the Interior, has apparently forced a French Wikipedia administrator to delete an article that in their opinionâas I understand itârevelead classified information deemed very harmful >> to >> > the French national defence ("compromission du secret de la Défense nationale"). >> > >> > Interestingly, they contacted the WMF legal team with a request to remove (delete? suppress?) this article a couple of weeks before >> that, >> > but were refused after failing to provide further information on why the article should be removed (in the words of a Foundation legal counsel). >> > >> > Undounted by that, they approached the said administrator â who operates under his real name, so I guess it was pretty easy to track him â and asked him to delete this article, a request which he obliged. (The article has since been restored by a different >> > administrator). As far as I understand, the version of the article they wanted to have deleted was >> > <https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=81104004>. >> > >> > I guess that when an intelligence agency asks their citizen to remove information from Wikipedia citing the penal code (article 413-11 of the French penal code in this case), it is something worth sharing >> (no >> > harm intended). >> > >> > Further reading in English: >> > * <https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=91703508> * <https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=91705235> >> > >> > -- >> > Tomasz W. KozÅowski >> > a.k.a. [[user:odder]] >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l >> > > > > -- > > Matthew Roth > Global Communications Manager > Wikimedia Foundation > +1.415.839.6885 ext 6635 > www.wikimediafoundation.org > *https://donate.wikimedia.org* > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
