On 28 April 2013 09:49, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem of internal communication came up again at WMCON, but only > about internal-l, see the couple quick opinions expressed: < > https://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_** > 2013/Documentation/Day_2/WMF_**board#Charles:_We_need_** > Internal-l.2C_what_do_you_**think.3F<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2013/Documentation/Day_2/WMF_board#Charles:_We_need_Internal-l.2C_what_do_you_think.3F> > > > > Oliver Keyes, 11/04/2013 17:33: > > > [...] > > Neither I do. I only asked if they *require* the > > compartmentalisation that e.g. Tom described – otherwise they could > > as well happen in a slightly different context (like for instance > > "use the internal wiki more", given that's the thread we're in). > > > > Yep; there's no reason we should be giving that sort of thing out to > > random chapters people or trusted volunteers; they have no use case for > it. > > "No reason to" is not a reason not to, so your "yes" means "no" given my > question. (And also by analogy, because most people in officewiki won't > have a use case for that stuff either.) > > When the information contains personal data, it is totally a reason not to. -- Oliver Keyes Community Liaison, Product Development Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l