On 31 July 2013 08:36, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31 July 2013 10:59, rupert THURNER <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> de:wp convinced you. What would it take to convince you on en:wp? (I'm > >> asking for a clear objective criterion here. If you can only offer a > >> subjective one, please explain how de:wp convinced you when en:wp > >> hasn't.) > > > Hi David, i am editing on dewp and enwp. I consider myself an experienced > > editor, but not an expert. I did not participate voting in dewp, but i > like > > to try ve from time to time. Beeing a software developper I fully support > > eriks arguments before. Imo pragmatic and flexible decisions help such > > development a lot, just like Erik explained. > > > Certainly. However, it's the obvious question to ask, and a curious > question to spend several paragraphs not answering. > > Erik, James - how did de:wp convinced you when en:wp hasn't? > > > I would also like to see a direct answer to David's very specific question.
Risker _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
