On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Michael Snow <wikipe...@frontier.com> wrote:
> On 7/31/2013 3:31 PM, Nathan wrote:
>> And another thought - you know what unites most of the other companies
>> represented by the logos in that image? Leaks have confirmed that most
>> of them are the subject of secret orders to turn over huge amounts of
>> raw data to the government. They are all bound to secrecy by law, so
>> without permission none of them are permitted to describe or disclose
>> the nature or extent of the data demands the U.S. government has made.
>> Now if you imagine the puzzle globe on that slide implies that
>> Wikipedia traffic is retained for intelligence analysis, it's a short
>> hop to assume that the Wikimedia Foundation is also the subject of a
>> blanket order transferring its server logs to the NSA.
> Facebook, Google, Yahoo, and Twitter, yes. But mail.ru? The shift from
> "most" to "all" in the first paragraph may make it easy to assume the
> similarity is universal, but it's ignoring the full context. That kind of
> rhetorical shift is a favorite trick of conspiracy theorists, it's how they
> get you to make those short hops to unwarranted conclusions.
> --Michael Snow

It's hardly a conspiracy theory. Given the differences between mail.ru
and Wikipedia, I should think it would be clear why one might be
subject to a direct demand for transferring data while the other is
not. If anything, I think it's more reasonable to assume that
Wikipedia (which shares many features with Google, Yahoo, Twitter,
Facebook and other social networks) has been the subject of this kind
of demand than that it hasn't. No one with direct knowledge would be
able to do anything other than deny it, but we can easily see why data
held by Wikipedia (including partially anonymized e-mails, file
uploads, talk page communication, etc.) would be of interest to
intelligence agencies.

Wikimedia-l mailing list
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Reply via email to