David I am glad to see to see that so far everybody agrees with me, just nobody can see the forest for the trees and most prefer to demonstrate how offended they feel at my pointing out how naked the emperor is.
So, whereas I write "complete rubbish", what do you do to fight "systemic bias [which] is a serious problem"? Rui On 1 August 2013 23:23, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 August 2013 22:19, Rui Correia <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So you mostly agree with m, but prefer to come out knee-jerking first and > > only after that showing that you somehow agree. > > > No, he's saying you're full of it, because you are. Under your > definition, there has never been an encyclopedia in human history. > This is not a useful definition. > > Systemic bias is a serious problem, but writing complete rubbish isn't > going to solve it. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > -- _________________________ Rui Correia Advocacy, Human Rights, Media and Language Work Consultant Bridge to Angola - Angola Liaison Consultant Mobile Number in South Africa +27 74 425 4186 Número de Telemóvel na África do Sul +27 74 425 4186 _______________ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
