To the best of my knowledge, every jurisdiction that has legislated on net neutrality has concentrated on preventing ISPs from blocking, degrading or charging extra for particular services; not one of them has a problem with providers giving away certain data for free.
S On 26 Aug 2013 04:51, "rupert THURNER" <rupert.thur...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > most people know some advantage of wikipedia zero and everybody can > look up the advantages by just typing wikipedia zero into some search > engine. as i am not sure about the answer and anyway get asked in rare > cases what i think of wp:zero i guess it should be best answered on > the mailing list: > > is wikipedia zero illegal in some countries because it violates net > neutrality? and if it is illegal or borderline according to, say, > netherlands, swiss, or german law, is it appropriate to do it in > countries where the law is less developed? or should wikimedia > foundation apply a higher moral standard and just abstain from any > activity which might be perceived as illegal somewhere? > > just for the ones not so sure about net neutrality [1]: > Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on > the Internet equally, not discriminating or charging differentially by > user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached > equipment, and modes of communication. > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality > > rupert. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>