On Sat, 5 Oct 2013, at 18:47, Fred Bauder wrote: > I've been thinking about this. Wikipedia is a compilation of information > from sources that are generally considered reliable. The trouble is that > the information in those sources varies. Rather than deciding ourselves, > after all most of us are amateurs, what the truth is, we present all the > views in reliable sources without trying to decide which is right or even > better, although there may be sourced information which does do that > which can be included. > > Fred
This is simply false. If a third source says that one of two reliable sources is wrong or simply worse, the third source is not ignored. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
