I have posted 4 sentences, kind of a draft of a draft of a draft. It is very overwhelming for me to draft text with near-legal precision on my own.
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko) On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Asaf Bartov <abar...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > I'd say "be bold" and start drafting. Many people respond to a flawed (or > at least improvable) text more readily than they do to an open invitation > to contribute. > > I, for one, share your perception that NPOV is a problem on some (perhaps > most) Wikipedias, and think it'd be a good idea to bolster NPOV with a > Board resolution. Not because it would instantly solve the problem, of > course, but I see its value in supporting those editors who'd fight to > uphold NPOV. > > A. > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:26 PM, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.n...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Legal_and_Community_Advocacy#Draft_of_text_for_a_binding_Neutral_Point_of_View_WMF_policy > > > > I started above text to draft a text for the board to review. > > > > -- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko) > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:56 PM, とある白い猫 <to.aru.shiroi.n...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > A talk page on meta wont be noticed by much which is why perhaps this > is > > > the better location for the discussion. It is not like I am proposing a > > > meta policy. > > > > > > -- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko) > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net > > >wrote: > > > > > >> >> I am not disputing how settled it is but I don't think meta > > >> >> sufficiently > > >> >> achieves expressing how settled this core value really is. As you > > >> >> stated > > >> >> it > > >> >> would be more of a restatement and re-emphasis of what already is a > > >> >> core > > >> >> value. > > >> >> > > >> >> -- 㠨㠂る白㠄猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko) > > >> > > > >> > Yes, good idea, needs to be done. Please notify the board of > > >> directors... > > >> > > > >> > Fred > > >> > > >> That was snippy... > > >> > > >> Editing a major meta policy page must be done with considerable > caution, > > >> starting by making suggestions on its talk page: > > >> > > >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Neutral_point_of_view > > >> > > >> There is some, rather limited, discussion in section 3. > > >> > > >> Fred > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Wikimedia-l mailing list > > >> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > , > > >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > > > -- > Asaf Bartov > Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org> > > Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the > sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! > https://donate.wikimedia.org > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
