Marc A. Pelletier wrote: >Seriously, however, I can understand why some current holders of rights >might have reservations about a policy that tightens greatly how private >information is handled and how much vetting is done on who does the >handling; but that tightening does very much need to take place.
Says who? I've been trying to get a clear answer to this question for the past few days. The access to non-public info policy is the Board's creation and the Board's prerogative. Is the Board interested in updating this policy? If not, then politely: why are we having this conversation? If so, why and in what ways would the Board like to see the policy updated? MZMcBride _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
