On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Michelle Paulson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I wanted to let you know that I have posted a > response<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Access_to_nonpublic_information_policy#Rethinking_the_access_policy:_Response_to_recent_feedback>to > the recent feedback we have received and very much look forward to > hearing your thoughts on the ideas proposed. I also wanted to thank you > all for the feedback over the past week and a half. It really helped us > understand your concerns and go back to the drawing board -- this > discussion has really reemphasized the value of community consultations > periods to me. In the end, we want to do what works for the community and > the movement. > > Best, > > Michelle >
Hi guys, In addition to the continuing discussion Michelle started above on whether we should check ID or not the legal team has also started responding with thoughts and some options on other suggestions and questions (such as retention time and keeping the data instead of the id). In all of these they’ve asked for thoughts if you haven’t checked the page since early/mid last week it would be great if you could check it again to weigh in. They will also be continuing to respond to unanswered questions and concerns so please don’t think your specific concern is being ignored. We have also reached out to all OTRS agents to make sure they are aware of a discussion on whether they should be included in the policy (currently only OTRS admins are). That conversation is ongoing at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Access_to_nonpublic_information_policy#OTRS_volunteers and could, again, use more comments whether you’re a member of OTRS or not. James James Alexander Legal and Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
