If October 4th and/or 22nd had large donations because of one-time events instead of regular donation appeal changes, why are they both bracketed by vastly abnormally successful previous and subsequent days?
On Monday, November 25, 2013, James Salsman wrote: > P.S. As the referenced attachment doesn't make it through to the > archives or digests, there is a copy of the fundraising data graph at: > http://i.imgur.com/MkXIW4J.png > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:51 PM, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Megan, > > > > Per the attached graph of the > > https://frdata.wikimedia.org/yeardata-day-vs-sum.csv > > data, your announced October 4th fundraising test on 100% of anonymous > > users was anticlimactic. But what the heck did you do on September 2nd > > and October 22nd, and would you please do that every day? Even if it > > falls off at the same rate as the July test, that still means you > > could produce an endowment sufficient to do away with fundraising at > > current spending levels in less than eight months. > > > > Best regards, > > James Salsman > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
