Matthew Walker wrote: > I have no information on what did or did not happen on any specific days
Who does? I'm also very interested in July 30, when average donations peaked; Ref.: http://i.imgur.com/3oXk7jq.png I can't figure anything actually useful out from http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2013#July_.26_August_Update On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:12 PM, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: > If October 4th and/or 22nd had large donations because of one-time events > instead of regular donation appeal changes, why are they both bracketed by > vastly abnormally successful previous and subsequent days? > > > On Monday, November 25, 2013, James Salsman wrote: >> >> P.S. As the referenced attachment doesn't make it through to the >> archives or digests, there is a copy of the fundraising data graph at: >> http://i.imgur.com/MkXIW4J.png >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:51 PM, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Megan, >> > >> > Per the attached graph of the >> > https://frdata.wikimedia.org/yeardata-day-vs-sum.csv >> > data, your announced October 4th fundraising test on 100% of anonymous >> > users was anticlimactic. But what the heck did you do on September 2nd >> > and October 22nd, and would you please do that every day? Even if it >> > falls off at the same rate as the July test, that still means you >> > could produce an endowment sufficient to do away with fundraising at >> > current spending levels in less than eight months. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > James Salsman _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
