On 2 March 2014 16:56, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/2/14, 5:31 PM, Chris McKenna wrote:
>> There is a further disconnect in that Commons is taking an increasingly >> ultra-conservative approach to the definition of "Free", whereas most other >> projects are working to a definition of "Free for all practical purposes". >> It is the latter interpretation that the board, in consultation with the >> legal team, are recommending as the way forward but is being resisted >> strongly by many on Commons. > This is more the crux of the issue, I think. I'm mostly familiar with > en.wiki, but on there the definition swings pretty far to the opposite > extreme, with a lot of content that is *not* Free for most practical > purposes. This discussion is not even about en:wp or its content; you are derailing the discussion. - d. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
