Makes sense to me too.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Alexander" <jameso...@gmail.com>
To: "Wikimedia Mailing List" <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] the big red notice on the top of
http://strategy.wikimedia.org - done
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Bohdan Melnychuk <bas...@yandex.ru> wrote:
But we close wiki. We not set wiki read only. Why should we use another
therm than the procedure is called?
Because what we DO (no matter what we call it) is set it as Read Only, it
is still 100% accessible you just can't edit it. I think it does make
sense
that 'read-only' is more understandable then 'close' which sounds like we
completely shut it off and you can't read it either.
James
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
