On 7 May 2014 18:14, Andreas Kolbe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Anne, there are really well-established systems of scholarly peer review.
> There is no need to reinvent the wheel, or add distractions such as
> infoboxes and other bells and whistles.
>
> I find it extraordinary that, after 13 years, a project designed to make
> the sum of human knowledge available to humanity, with an annual budget of
> $50 million, has no clue how to measure the quality of the content it is
> providing, no apparent interest in doing so, and no apparent will to spend
> money on it.
>
> For what it's worth, there was a recent external study of Wikipedia's
> medical content that came to unflattering results:
>
> http://www.jaoa.org/content/114/5/368.full
>
> ---o0o---
>
> Most Wikipedia articles for the 10 costliest conditions in the United
> States contain errors compared with standard peer-reviewed sources. Health
> care professionals, trainees, and patients should use caution when using
> Wikipedia to answer questions regarding patient care.
>
> Our findings reinforce the idea that physicians and medical students who
> currently use Wikipedia as a medical reference should be discouraged from
> doing so because of the potential for errors.
>
>

> Doesn't help very much in assessing the quality of the article on
> [[Liancourt Rocks]] - when depending on where in the world one is, the
> article can be reasonably accurate or completely inaccurate.  This is one
> of the geographic issues of which I speak.


There are also issues with the study you reference - it's quite biased
toward American information and the articles only have two reviewers. It
perhaps points out how easy it is to get junk science published in
peer-reviewed journals if the topic is "sexy" enough - their own
study wouldn't meet our standards for inclusion.

Risker/Anne
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to