On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Michael Maggs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Measuring the quality of Wikipedia articles in general is an issue that > Wikimedia UK is interested in looking at, though by means of automation > rather than the gold-standard but much less scalable method of scholarly > peer review. > It doesn't *have* to be scalable. That's what sampling was invented for. Automation. As they say, if all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
