Hoi,
Lets talk
Thanks,
Gerard
On 16 June 2014 13:29, Anders Wennersten <m...@anderswennersten.se> wrote:
> we have now spent one year trying to use Wikidata operationally, in our
> botprojects, but found it is impossible in the state it is now, from many
> perspectives. It has been a big disappointment but we hope it will look
> better a year from now
> Anders
>
>
>
> Gerard Meijssen skrev 2014-06-16 12:44:
>
> Hoi,
>> I blogged about Lsjbot.. [1]. I really hope that a lot of attention is
>> given in finding the links to existing items in Wikidata.
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>> [1]
>> http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2014/06/wikipedia-
>> to-bot-or-not-to-bot.html
>>
>>
>> On 16 June 2014 12:25, Anders Wennersten <m...@anderswennersten.se>
>> wrote:
>>
>> After having changed job and residence Sverker is now on it again. This
>>> time Lsjbot will generate some 300 000 articles on plant species. The
>>> initiative is now receiving full support and even enthusiasm from the
>>> fellow wikipedians on svwp
>>>
>>> It is now close to one year since the 1M article on insects, animal etc
>>> was generated and we now have had some feedback whereof I here give some
>>> examples
>>> *The students on a university veterinary course was given the assignment
>>> to write article on parasitic worms and put them up om Wikipedia. These
>>> became excellent: complete and voluminous. This was in many way
>>> helped/made
>>> possible by that there already existed Lsjbot stubs with complete
>>> Taxobox,
>>> iw-links, categories and basic sources. The students are expert on
>>> subjects
>>> not the wikispecialities
>>> *the experts on animal etc among our Wikipedians has now shifted focus.
>>> There are species where the authorities disagree on the taxonomy and
>>> here
>>> Lsjbot did not generate any article. among birds there are some 500
>>> disputed species. These articles our experts now work with, highlighting
>>> the disputes, why, what and by whom. And when we compare these manually
>>> created articles we find that on most other language versions, these
>>> only
>>> take data from one authority and are not correctly describing the
>>> dispute.
>>> Perhaps svwp will after this not only be most complete but also most
>>> correct version on species?
>>>
>>> As a side effect (not a goal in itself) we expect svwp to be the second
>>> biggest version, when it comes to number of articles, by August/September
>>>
>>> And when it comes to botgeneration in general, we are continuing our
>>> researcheffort into generate some 0,3-0,5 M articles on geographic
>>> entities
>>> from all over the world by end 2015/2016 using Wikidata as a source.
>>>
>>> Anders
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>>> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
>> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
